The Firewall is not a quiz. It's a process — four questions that force different kinds of thinking about one decision. The writing is the thinking. Each gate slows you down at exactly the moment you're most likely to be reactive.
Allow 15–25 minutes. There are no right answers — only honest ones.
Your responses are saved privately and used only to support your coaching relationship.
Be specific. Vague decisions get vague thinking. If you're struggling to put it in one or two sentences, you may not have scoped the decision correctly yet — that's useful information.
You'll have the chance to refine this as you move through the gates.
Example: You think you're deciding whether to fire someone. You're actually deciding whether you're willing to have the hard conversation. Name both layers.
There is no minimum length. There is no maximum. Write until you've said what needs saying.
Don't defend your instinct. Build the strongest possible case for the other side. If you can't, you haven't thought hard enough — or the decision is already made.
Discomfort here is a signal, not a problem. Lean into it.
Consider: time, energy, attention, key relationships, reputation, and the second-order effects no one is talking about. Name the thing you've been avoiding naming.
The embarrassment test is deliberate. If you'd be embarrassed to admit you missed it, write it down.
Write both. Don't skip the regret side — it usually carries more signal than the pride side. Your future self has perspective your present self lacks.
The contrast between proud and regret often reveals what actually matters most.
Read what you wrote. This is the first time you've seen your thinking in one place.
Five signals. Not scored — named. Your analytical thinking is done. Now check the rest of the system.
Your thinking is saved. Before you walk into the room — or make the call — print your brief to take with you.